Kristin L. Moilanen, Ph.D.

Visiting Senior Research Specialist, University of Illinois at Chicago

Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?


Journal article


Kristin L Moilanen
Journal of youth and adolescence, 2016

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Moilanen, K. L. (2016). Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research? Journal of Youth and Adolescence.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Moilanen, Kristin L. “Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?” Journal of youth and adolescence (2016).


MLA   Click to copy
Moilanen, Kristin L. “Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2016.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{kristin2016a,
  title = {Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?},
  year = {2016},
  journal = {Journal of youth and adolescence},
  author = {Moilanen, Kristin L}
}

Abstract

To date, there is limited knowledge about how parents make decisions about adolescents’ participation in sexuality research. This gap was addressed in the present study, which explored parents’ reasons for providing or denying consent and their suggestions for improving the likelihood of consent. 151 parents responded through anonymous internet surveys (85.3 % mothers; 87 % European American). Those who would likely consent were largely motivated by potential benefits and limited risks of participating in the study. Those unlikely to consent expressed discomfort with sexual content, which they viewed as inappropriate for sexually-naïve adolescents. Most were somewhat more likely to consent if researchers engaged in ethical research practices (e.g., protecting confidentiality). As in other adolescent life domains, parents’ decisions strongly reflected their desire to protect their teenagers’ wellbeing, though respondents’ means of pursuing this goal varied. The discussion centers on the findings’ implications for theory development and recruitment efforts.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in